📰 GraphFinancials Blog

Financial analysis, market insights and research articles.

Filter: All Accounting Rules Bank Delinquencies China Classical Economics Clément Juglar Commodities contrarian investing Credit Credit Cycle doxa Eletric-Vehicles-EVs Energy Transition Fiscal Policy Geopolitics Henry Thornton Longi market bubbles Mark to Model Molten-Salt Monetary Policy Motorcycles-Motorbikes Non Performing Loans Oil Oil Embargo Oil Shock paradox investing renewable energy Supply Shock Trade Balance US Dollar US Treasuries war
Molten Salt Nuclear Reactor — Without the Nuclear, Powered by Wind (and Cheaper)
Molten Salt Nuclear Reactor — Without the Nuclear, Powered by Wind (and Cheaper)

Molten salt systems retrofit coal plants into thermal batteries: excess wind/solar heats salt, stored energy later drives turbines. Fuel is eliminated, costs shift to capex, and long-duration storage (days–weeks) becomes cheap. This “Carnot battery” model undercuts gas by absorbing surplus and serving peaks, turning coal assets into dispatchable, fuel-free power hubs.

In defense of the ECB on not raising rates during a supply shock, what Thornton told us should be the central bank response to a “bad harvest”.
In defense of the ECB on not raising rates during a supply shock, what Thornton told us should be the central bank response to a “bad harvest”.

ECB critics misread inflation: echoing Henry Thornton, supply shocks (like energy or bad harvests) create temporary imbalances, not monetary excess. Raising rates won’t fix supply and can worsen it by choking credit and slowing adjustment (e.g. renewables). The right response is real-side adjustment, not tightening, especially with cartelized energy prices.

Remember how the oil interests were lobbying against nuclear back in the 1970s embargo, and now they are lobbying against solar and wind?
Remember how the oil interests were lobbying against nuclear back in the 1970s embargo, and now they are lobbying against solar and wind?

Remember how oil interests lobbied against nuclear during the 1970s embargo, and now push against solar and wind? Oil lost electricity; now natural gas faces the same threat. Nuclear acts as a decoy—baseload, expensive, and not flexible. Wind, solar, and EVs disrupt variable demand and transport. Energy transitions repeat: oil → electricity, gas → electricity, oil → transport. RINSE / REPEAT.

How Sugar Beet Annihilated Sugar Cane and its Embargoes – Gasoline vs EVs, Nat Gas vs Renewables. RINSE/REPEAT
How Sugar Beet Annihilated Sugar Cane and its Embargoes – Gasoline vs EVs, Nat Gas vs Renewables. RINSE/REPEAT

From the 17th century, Caribbean sugar fueled European wealth via plantations reliant on enslaved labor. Napoleonic Wars, slave revolts, and embargoes disrupted trade, while Europe’s sugar beet offered a cheaper, local alternative. Similarly, today EVs, renewables, and local energy reduce dependence on oil and natural gas, slashing costs and reshaping global energy markets—history repeating itself in technological disruption.

War, Energy Prices, and Expected “Unexpected” Consequences
War, Energy Prices, and Expected “Unexpected” Consequences

Energy price shocks from war don’t reinforce fossil fuels—they accelerate their decline. As seen after the Russia conflict, higher oil and gas prices drove rapid EV adoption and faster renewable substitution across major economies. With cost curves falling, each new shock strengthens the transition rather than reversing it.

War Is Not Deflationary — Ever
War Is Not Deflationary — Ever

Wars are not deflationary, especially for the U.S., where high debt and deficit monetization create inflationary pressures. Bond rallies during crises are often knee-jerk reactions, not true signals. With heavy short-term issuance, repo stress, and structural deficits, markets may misread conditions. If conflict persists, risks shift toward inflation and potential instability in the U.S. bond market.

CONNECTING THE DOTS: NIIC position, US reliance on external capital, Renewable energy hostility from Mr. Trump, And the bond market.
CONNECTING THE DOTS: NIIC position, US reliance on external capital, Renewable energy hostility from Mr. Trump, And the bond market.

"US NIIC deficit worsens as renewables threaten petrodollar demand. Why Trump's anti-EV stance links to foreign capital dependency. Data-driven analysis.